Adult morons – the world has never experienced this openly before. Although I suspected such behaviour existed, politicians concealed it. After the masses’ revolution, public games became acceptable.
I do not consider myself qualified to discuss such serious matters. While I may engage in political fiction, understanding its essence is another matter. However, political fiction has now become a reality, raising whether such fiction conceals a deeper reality that can be explored through imagination. Regarding qualifications, it might be that Vance writes books, and O’Creamy discusses politics and its underlying conditions.
In this situation, each individual holds a valid perspective based on an intended use of such rights in practice. Kraśko is justified in his criticism of Zelensky, Miller accurately forecasts potential outcomes, and other commentators have their own legitimate viewpoints. Consequently, I also possess my own right to express an opinion. As long as freedom of speech is upheld, everyone can articulate respective rights.
It is essential to acknowledge that the visible scene where political events occur is not the sole reality. Reality operates on multiple levels, with the visible part merely representing the surface, often obscured like a murky water surface of a fast-flowing river. Beneath this surface, there are unknown dynamics, much like predatory fish that remain unseen and will likely never be fully understood. The figures we passionately discuss are merely a distant reflection of the deeper happenings.
To simplify greatly, I will introduce two levels here. The first, external, where yesterday evening two adult morons publicly kicked a weaker person for their and the crowd’s amusement. The second, underneath, where nothing happened because there was no conflict of interests.
It has been my longstanding observation that there is no genuine conflict between the United States and Russia (formerly the Soviet Union). While we may witness displays of ostensibly hostile interactions daily, underlying these events are shared interests. I hold this conclusion with a high degree of confidence.
For an extended period, the United States has maintained a consistent policy focused on its national interests, which are intricately linked to Russia due to various dependencies. While actions of American leaders have varied, reflecting different approaches, the most recent democratically elected leader has faced criticism for lacking decorum, thereby exposing aspects of public behaviour that are typically discreet. This perceived decline in political culture is attributed to the involvement of less experienced individuals in politics. However, fundamentally, these underlying issues have always existed.
Moreover, we make a mistake by accusing the orange-hued Donald of being a Russian puppet. In fact, it is the other way around; the Russian leader is a figurine in American hands. If we look closely at the situation, weakening Russia is in the Americans’ interest, and Putin is degrading Russia to the role of a mere instrument, no matter whose. He remains the governor of a great source of raw materials, without actual processing power.
Conversely, Ukraine has historically functioned as part of a larger geopolitical entity. When separated from this context, it has presented strategic challenges. Despite ongoing conflicts, Ukraine retains significant demographic, scientific, and industrial potential, which once contributed to the strength of the Soviet Union. Consequently, Russia has sought to reassert control over Ukraine, intending to integrate it back into its sphere of influence. The current conflict not only aims to weaken Russia but also serves to diminish Ukraine’s capacity, making it reliant on external powers. President Zelensky now represents a complicating factor for both Russian leadership and stakeholders in Washington.
The United States assessed that both Ukraine and Russia had weakened sufficiently, making it possible to achieve their objectives with minimal effort. Traditional principles of discretion suggested conducting operations without attracting attention or publicity. Nonetheless, they opted to proceed openly and publicly, possibly believing their constituents required such transparency. Though this method might have seemed like a mere detail, it raises concerns about potential long-term consequences. True strategists, who prefer to operate discreetly, may disapprove of these tactics, as they typically favour actions carried out in silence.
The current leaders of America openly share information. The president makes announcements publicly, and it is important to consider his statements. When he says that Europe was united to mislead America, he conveys his belief.
Furthermore, the involvement of China adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Somebody says that Trump agreed with the Russians that he would let Ukraine go for Gaza and agreement on the expulsion of the Palestinians. Maybe so. Who knows? After World War II, no one considered China, now they must. It is not known to whom the capital will give Russia and Ukraine for management.
The following are hypotheses.
The first hypothesis: two adult morons publicly engage in kicking a person lying down, justifying their actions as being beneficial for the individual. The motive behind this action appears to be related to a specific business objective. Putin’s actions have reportedly weakened Russia to the extent that negotiations can now take place. Resources will remain accessible, irrespective of which party is involved. Zelensky is perceived as no longer necessary and has faced public consequences.
The second, more subtle implication could be that Zelensky was intentionally participating in the spectacle, which aimed to prompt Europe, designed to mislead America, into action. In this scenario, further developments are anticipated.
None of these hypotheses consider values, ethics, or morality. The underlying aspects of politics have become apparent, revealing elements that will alter human society. Two morons demonstrated that everything is possible without consequences. Additionally, it appears they acted with genuine belief in the correctness of their actions, which may indicate a lack of insight, and no interventions will assist Mr. Vance in this regard. The ability to author books does not equate to being a paragon of morality, even within the context of regional ethical standards.
The result is a pervasive nihilism within contemporary mercantilism. There is a prevailing belief that actions can be taken without concern for potential sanctions from any source. Regrettably, the situation is likely to deteriorate further. I do not anticipate any significant improvements.
Leave a Reply